Thursday, January 31, 2013

Massachusetts Division of Banks visit Massachusetts Division of Banks website

Semester: 2013 Spring

Project Type: Dispute System Evaluation

Students: Natalie Perez & Lauren Schloss

Mass Division of Banks Team - Natalie Perez & Lauren Schloss

The Massachusetts Division of Banks (DOB) is a regulatory agency within the Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation whose mission is to advance the public interest by ensuring a sound, competitive, and accessible banking and financial services environment.

The DOB is responsible for the supervision of more than 200 state-chartered banks and credit unions. It also licenses and supervises: nearly 800 mortgage lenders and brokers; over 4,000 individual mortgage loan originators; and an additional 3,500 non-bank financial entities, including check cashers, money transmitters, finance companies, and debt collectors.

As the DOB oversees its non-depository licensees, it conducts examinations to assess the level of compliance with consumer protection laws, as well as determines that the entities are operating in a safe and sound manner. For entities that are found to be operating in an unsound manner, the DOB has the authority to issue temporary cease-and-desist orders. Additionally, the DOB has the authority to suspend or revoke licenses of regulated  licensees. At times disputes will emerge and  a licensee will seek to appeal the DOB findings by requesting an administrative adjudicatory hearing pursuant to laws and regulations governing administrative procedure.

The DOB has engaged HNMCP to conduct a review of the DOB’s current administrative appeals process, research best practices for administrative hearings, and provide the DOB with  recommendations on how a hearing process may be best implemented.

Our Work

  • Identify and assess the current informal and formal administrative appeal procedures at the DOB through interviews with enforcement/legal counsel, non-depository staff, and investigative examiners
  • Identify and evaluate appeal and hearing models that are effectively employed by other state or federal regulatory agencies
  • Identify and evaluate hearing models utilized by regulators of similar size and staffing composition as the DOB
  • Research other administrative appeals options for consideration

Deliverables envisioned:

  • A report that includes recommendations for a  a dispute and administrative appeal system design that deploys staff in a way that considers both the need for autonomy in the administrative hearing  process as well as the staff’s other duties, and that highlights best practices at other governmental agencies.
Skip to toolbar